Punjab National Bank v. R and R Banquet Hall
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/385/2022 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Vs R AND R BANQUET HALL
18.04.2023 Item No.40
Present: Sh. DK Gupta, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Raj Kumar Dogra, and has made a statement at the bar that the account of the defendants have been upgraded and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- appellant
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
- respondent
R AND R BANQUET HALL
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court