In an amicably settled case, the Tribunal permitted the applicant to withdraw the Original Application and ordered the refund of court fees to the borrower.
Original Application dismissed as withdrawn; court fees refunded to borrower.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.16
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.2304 of 2023
In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.312 of 2022
ICICI Bank Ltd.
… Applicant
Versus
M/s. Tanishq Traders Thrugh Mr … Defendant Mitin Jagdish Shroff
Ms Priti Tapdiya i/b M/s. Bhide & Associates – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkarnd November 2023.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar)
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
02.11.2023 Sr. No.16
| OA No.312 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. M/s. Tanishq Traders Through Mr. Mitin Jagdish Shroff |
| Ms Priti Tapdiya i/b M/s. Bhide & Associates – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 10 | 1. Ms Tapdiya has presented additional affidavit (exhibit- 10), which is taken on record. 2. Order in Interlocutory Application No.2304 of 2023 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.2304 of 2023, Original Application No.312 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed (i) to refund the court fees and (ii) to return the original documents as per the Rules. |
|
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
ICICI Bank Ltd.
M/s. Tanishq Traders Through Mr. Mitin Jagdish Shroff
Radhika
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
