Canara Bank v. Bal Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
In OA/31/2022, the applicant bank moved the Debts Recovery Tribunal for an order. The matter was withdrawn in court by the applicant's counsel as the parties had reached a compromise of Rs. 5,00,000. The OA was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Refund of court fees as per rules.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/31/2022 CANARA BANK Vs BAL SINGH
24.04.2023 Item No.27
Present: Ms.Jivika, proxy for Sh.Neeraj Madan, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Mohit Bhatnagar, and has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter for sum of Rs.5,00,000/- and she does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank
- respondent
Bal Singh
Coram
(A S Narang)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court