The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an Original Application filed by State Bank of India for recovery of home loan and suraksha dues against two borrowers, holding the bank established its claim.
Defendants liable to pay Rs.21,97,084/- with interest; bank entitled to proceed against mortgaged and other properties; costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL-I AT HYDERABAD DATED THIS THE llTH DAY oF DECEMBER, 2023
PRESENT: sRI GUMMADI GoPICHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER OA.No.297 ot 2022
Between:
State Bank of India. Retail Assets & Small Medium Enterprises, - -'' " "' ", d. i t_c e n t re, ( RA S M E C C C j ,9 j !y-^c_re warangal Zonal office. H.No.9-1-2, JpN road. Warangal - 506 OO2. Represented by its Chief Manager
Applicant
VERSUS
Defendants
Counsel for the parties:
For the Applicant
For the Defendants 1 & 2
(oA.No.297 /20221
ORDER
(OA.No.297 /20221
AW.1 and exhibited relevant documents, which are marked as
Ex.A.1 to A.7.
entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendants as
prayed for?
l - B. i'+ 11DE[1nI : In the result, the pre6ent OA is allowed wittri ,as under:
(oA.No.29712022)
(Dictated to
court on in the open
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled to the recovery claim made in the OA against the Defendants as prayed for?
State Bank of India
Jangilisrinivasa Rao
Lakkakula Suma Rani
Gummadi Gopichand
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
