The tribunal allowed the applicant bank's petition to treat the OA as settled out of court after respondents remitted a sum under a settlement scheme, disposed without costs, and directed refund of court fee.
OA treated as settled out of court; disposed without costs; applicant to file for refund of court fee.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
OA No.252/2022 03.03.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL – III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K. Presiding Officer
O.A. No. 252 of 2022
M/s. Bank of Baroda, Rep. by its Senior Manager, Gummudipundi Branch, Rettembedu Road, Opp. to Malleeswari Kalyana Mandabam, Gummidipundi – 601 201. ....Applicant
Versus
Counsel for Applicant : M/s.G.R.Lakshmanan.
2
OA No.252/2022 03.03.2023
O R D E R
(Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and processed through E-drt on this the 03rd day of March, 2023)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the OA for recovery should be treated as settled out of court upon remittance under OTS.
M/s. Bank of Baroda
M/s.New Murugan Stores
Mr.C.Jagadeesan
Mrs.J.Saraswathi
V.Thangaraj
Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
