The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an Original Application filed by the applicant bank as it had been withdrawn following a compromise between the parties for a specific sum.
The OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn. Registrar is directed to refund the court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/215/2022 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs SH PRASHANT GUPTA
13.10.2023 Item No.7
Present: Sh. Yogesh Kumar, proxy for Sh.Rakesh Gupta, Counsel for the Applicant. None for the defendants
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Pardeep Kumar Arora, and has made a statement at the Bar that the parties have compromised the matter for a sum of Rs.30,74,933/- and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
STATE BANK OF INDIA
SH PRASHANT GUPTA
AS Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
