The applicant bank moved an Original Application in the DRT. The counsel stated that the parties had compromised under the OTS scheme, and the bank did not wish to pursue the matter. Consequently, the OA was dismissed as withdrawn.
OA dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/2122/2022 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Vs RANJIT SINGH
24.07.2023 Item No.40
Present: Sh.Bharat Kawal, proxy for Sh.KBS Manhas, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Muneet Mahajan, and has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter under the OTS scheme and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
RANJIT SINGH
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
