The applicant bank admitted a compromise settlement between the parties for Rs. 11,00,000/- and withdrew the original application. The arbitrator dismissed the appeal as withdrawn and ordered the refund of court fees.
Court fees refunded to the applicant bank as per rules.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/1984/2022 CANARA BANK Vs SURJIT KAUR @ SURJIR KAUR
29.03.2023 Item No.18
Present: Sh. Nandram Purohit, proxy for Sh.Sanjiv Gupta, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Ms.Neeru, and has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter for sum of Rs.11,00,000/- and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
CANARA BANK
SURJIT KAUR
(A S Narang)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
