In a Lok Adalat proceeding before the DRT, Chandigarh, the Bank filed an affidavit stating the account was settled in full. The applicant Bank sought withdrawal. The Tribunal dismissed the O.A. as withdrawn.
The O.A. filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL.I, CHANDIGARH
oA/ L789 / 2022 UBI V/S SUKHDEEP SINGH
AWARD
13.O5.2023
Item No.36
,Counsel for the Applicant. sh.
,Counsel for defendants.
File put up in the..Lok Adalat,,.
Bank has fired the affidavit to the effect that the account has been setfled at Rs.Zg,LB,O7U_ in full and final setilement and it does not want to pursue the present oA Accordingry, the oA filed by the appricant bank is dismissed as withdrawn. A copy of this order be given to both the parties free of cost. File be P-Lfu.d consiqned i G. to record room i""; ;ti;;J/; after ,)'-, due cgmpliance...."p['";, '
... '
. ..j- . ....1t].:....'.,:r',,] :r..... .:
(Registrar)
UTI Bank
Sukhdeep Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
