Appeal against an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal based on a settlement between the parties. The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the appeal treating it as withdrawn.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/1571/2022 KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED Vs SH KESAR SINGH
29.03.2023 Item No.23
Present: Sh. Sukhvinder Singh, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Munish Sharma, and has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter for sum of Rs.51,50,000/- and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Sh Kesar Singh
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
