Uco Bank v. Mr Jatinderpal Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant bank's OA as withdrawn following a compromise between parties for Rs.36,21,050/- and closure of the account.
What did the court decide?
Refund of court fees to the applicant.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/1356/2022 UCO BANK Vs MR JATINDERPAL SINGH
26.04.2023 Item No.58
Present: Sh. SN Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Ms.Shailza Bhatia, and has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter for a sum of Rs.36,21,050/- and account has been closed and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCO BANK
- respondent
MR JATINDERPAL SINGH
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court