The applicant bank sought withdrawal of an OA after the respondent deposited the overdue amount. The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the OA as withdrawn and directed refund of court fees.
OA dismissed as withdrawn; refund of court fees directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/1211/2022 PUNJAB AND SIND BANK Vs SH MANJOTPREET SINGH
21.04.2023 Item No.15
Present: Sh. Neeraj Madan, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Ravi Kumar, Branch Manager, and has made a statement at the bar that the defendants have deposited the overdue amount and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Punjab and Sind Bank
Sh Manjotpreet Singh
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
