Disposed
Bank of Baroda v. Shamik
DRTOA/119/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 09/01/2023 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in OA 119 of 2022 Bank of Baroda Vs Shamik Apparao |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate Dhrumil Shah I/b MDP Partners appeared for the applicant. None for the defendant. By way of the present pursis the applicant has submitted that the personal insolvency proceeding has been initiated qua the defendant no. 1 & 2 and CIRP process is admitted against the defendant no.3. She also informed that these are the contesting defendant in the present OA. Looking to the facts that NCLT proceeding has already been initiated against the contesting defendant no. 1, 2 & 3 therefore, moratorium may be applicable in the present matter thus, the present OA is hereby disposed off with a liberty to the applicant to revive the same as and when required. File be closed and confined to record room. P.O. DRT-I |
¶2
Sgj/-13
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Bank of Baroda
- respondent
Shamik Apparao
Coram
AI extract
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court