Canara Bank v. P Sudha
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant Bank sought recovery of dues from three respondents. The respondents, represented only by their mother, were heard ex-parte. The Presiding Officer examined documents marking the defendants liable and allowed the application.
What did the court decide?
Direct payment of Rs. 34,05,447/ - with future interest, security on mortgaged properties, and entitlement to costs.
What the court decided
]N THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KOTHE, B.Com., L.LB. (Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER
Original Application No: 118 OF 2022
Canara Bank, Anantapur Main Branch-I, D.No. 12-3-50, Sai Enclave, Sai Nagar 3d Cross, Anantapu ramu-515001, Andhra Pradesh. Rep. by its Principal Officer.
......Applicant
VERSUS
- Smt. P. Sudha, W/o. Late P. Sasikanth Reddy, Aged: 38 Years, Kuderu Village And lYandal, Anantapuramu Dist. Andhra Pradesh-515001.
- P. Yamini D/o. Late P. Sasikanth Reddy, Aged: 20 Years, Kuderu Village And Mandal, Anantapuramu Dist. Andhra Pradesh-515001
- P. Kirthana D/o. Late. P. Sasikanth Reddy Aged lvlinor, Rep. by her natural Guardian and mother Smt. P. Sudha Aged: 15 Years, Kuderu Village and l,landal Anantapuramu District Anddhra Pradesh-515001. flrxr.. /..r*1!\
....... Defendants
OA No.118/2022
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendants and OA Schedule properties?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank, Anantapur Main Branch-I
- respondent
Smt. P. Sudha
- respondent
P. Yamini
- respondent
P. Kirthana
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court