State Bank of India v. M/S Gupta Electronics
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/1143/2023 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs M/S GUPTA ELECTRONICS
28.07.2023 Item No.21
Present: Sh. Rahul Shrama, proxy for Sh.Sumit Narang, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Mr.Rahul Sharma, Counsel for the applicant bank made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State Bank of India
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court