The Debts Recovery Tribunal disposed of Original Application No. 11/2022 filed by Indian Overseas Bank against Kundlik Wagh as dismissed, noting the account was closed and the amount received.
Original Application No. 11/2022 dismissed; original title documents returned; court fee refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
| 01.09. Sr. No |
2023 .82 OA No. 11/2022 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 11/2022 Indian Overseas Bank ..Applicant Versus Kundlik Wagh ..Defendants Mr. V.R. Patil– Advocate for the applicant. Mr. K.J. Suryawanshi - Advocate for the defendants. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant-bank submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed.He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. The counsel requests for return of the original documents and also refund of the court fees as per rules. 3. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Original Application No.11/2022 stands dismissed. |
||
| B. The original title documents, if any filed be returned as per rules. |
||
| C. Court fee be refunded as per rules and as per orders of Hon’ble Bombay high Court. D. Consign the file to the Record Room. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (OA No.11/2022) Page 1 of 1
Indian Overseas Bank
Kundlik Wagh
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
