MA No.58/2023 was allowed allowing restoration of Special Appeal No.108/2021 which had been earlier dismissed. The respondent bank raised no objection.
MA No.58/2023 allowed; SA No.108/2021 restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA No.58/2023 IN SA No.108/2021 M/s Raja Industries Vs. Union Bank of India
23.08.2023 Item No.92
Present: Ms.Deepshikha Gupta, Counsel for the Applicant. Ms.Puja Sharma, Counsel for respondent bank.
Registrar has put up this matter before me.
Heard on MA No.58/2023 for restoration of SA No.108/2021, which was dismissed on 16.08.2023. Ms.Puja Sharma has put in appearance on behalf of respondent bank and has made a statement at the bar that she has no objection in case MA for restoration is allowed. In view of this, the MA is allowed and disposed of .
SA No.108/2021 is ordered to be restored to its original number.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
Manoj
M/s Raja Industries
Union Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
