Rahul Mahajan v. Icici Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed MA No.56/2023 filed for restoration. Based on the respondent bank's consent, the Special Appeal No.108/2017 was restored to its original number.
What did the court decide?
MA No.56/2023 allowed; SA No.108/2017 restored to original number.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/56/2023 RAHUL MAHAJAN Vs ICICI BANK LTD
29.08.2023 Item No.86
Present: Sh. Vishal Handa, Counsel for the Applicant.
Sh. Rajiv Sharma, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Sharma, has made a statement at the Bar that he has no objection, if the application for restoration is allowed. Accordingly, MA No.56/2023 in SA No.108/2017 is hereby allowed. SA No.108/2017 has been restored to its original number vide order passed today in MA No.56/2023.
To come up on 02.09.2023.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rahul Mahajan
- respondent
ICICI Bank Ltd
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court