Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the applicant's default application after no party appeared for hearing, concluding the applicant lost interest in the matter.
Application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/42/2022 GURINDER SINGH SIDHU Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED 14.07.2023 Item No.75
Present: None for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
GURINDER SINGH SIDHU
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
