The applicant failed to appear despite multiple calls. The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application in default due to the applicant's lack of interest and non-appearance.
Application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/40/2022 In SA No.89/2022 SMT RAJINDER KAUR Vs CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
13.07.2023 Item No.52
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh.Aksheydeep Singh, proxy Counsel for the respondent bank.
Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 02:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Smt Rajinder Kaur
Central Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
