The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an application seeking condonation of delay to recall a prior order, finding the reasons provided by the applicant unconvincing and lacking support.
Miscellaneous Application No.31/2023 admitted for condonation of delay stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 15.06 Sr. N |
.2023 o.02 MA No.31/2023 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| MISC. APPLICATION No.31/2023 | ||
| Sachin Rangnath Admane ..Applicant/s Versus Central Bank of India ..Respondent/s Mr. Vijay Deshmukh - Advocate for the applicants. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. This is a Miscellaneous Application No.31/2023 has been filed for the condonation of delay of 143 days for recalling the order dated 13thJanuary, 2023. The reasons given therein are not at all convincing. 2. It is the duty of the advocate and the client to take care of their matters. The story made out in the Miscellaneous Application is not at all convincing as there is nothing supporting to him. |
||
| 3. Since the condonation of delay is not permitted this Miscellaneous Application No.31/2023 is liable to be dismissed. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. Miscellaneous Application No.31/2023 for condonation of delay stands dismissed. B. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] ( MA No.31/2023) Page 1 of 1
Sachin Rangnath Admane
Central Bank of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
