The DRT conduced delay in filing a Chamber Appeal by the Applicant against Bank of Baroda, subject to payment of fees, and allowed the appeal directing removal of defects within 10 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 04/05/2023 | Ex. No. Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in MA 22 of 2023 Mukeshbhai R Bhadiyadra Vs Bank of Baroda |
Next date |
|---|---|---|
| Advocate Mr. Herbert Noronha appeared for the Applicant. |
||
| Advocate Mr. Nilesh Bamne i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co. appeared for the Defendant. IA No. 275/2023 1. By way of the present MA, the Applicant is seeking condonation of delay in filing Chamber Appeal. 2. Looking to the facts mentioned in the MA, the delay in filing the present CA is hereby condoned subject to payment of Rs. 10,000/- to be paid to the DRT Bar Association of Mumbai. |
||
| Chamber Appeal No. 5/2023 In view of the facts mentioned in the Chamber Appeal the same is hereby allowed and the Appellant is hereby directed to remove defects within 10 days from today in any case. |
With the above said direction the Chamber Appeal is hereby disposed off. Ex-8 Service affidavit P.O. DRT-I
Sgj/-19
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the Chamber Appeal is condonable under the relevant rules.
Whether the Appellant's Chamber Appeal regarding removal of defects is maintainable and allowable.
Mukeshbhai R Bhadiyadra
Rekha G Dhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
