Allowed

Icici Bank Limited v. M/S Garlico Industries Ltd.

DRT28 Jul 2023MA/4/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed a miscellaneous application for variation of notice and restoration of an original application dismissed for want of prosecution, adjudging that the applicant had legitimate reasons for the delay in receiving notice.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal order of OA No. 306/16 dated 04/11/22 set aside; OA restored for hearing on merit in original court; Registry directed to list matter.

DATE	DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER	REMARK
MA04/23 28107123	ShriVedant^{Agrarval,Advlbrthe Applicant} Bank Noneforthe^{Non-APPlicant} l.Application^{lilruavicr ttlissucnoticctothc} Non-Rpplicarrts^{istakcnuplbrconsideration'} 2. Applicant^{Counsclb1inritingattcntion-trr} ordeidated^{O4llll22passedundcrOA} No.306i16^{submitsthatonthedateo} dismissalof^{OAnooneappearedonbehalfo} Non-Appticants^{therelbrethcreisnoneedtt} issueir.rrlont^{lil'Non-Applicantslir} hearing on^{this MA.} appearedon^{bchall'ol'theA} onbehall-of^{Non-APPlicant} 3.Applicant^{CounseltufthersLrbmitsthatii} OAalsoNon-^{Aplllicarltsltavcalrcad]} declaredex-paltc^{andrrithdlawalaflldaviti} OAhasalreadY^beenf-rled. 4.Looking^{tothe lactthaton0alll/22r'r'hcl} OAno.306/16^{u'ascallcdlorhcaringnoot"l} pplicantsandal:l stoothenOAhd beendismissed^{lorwantofprosecution andfl} restoration^{o1-thesamcthisMAisfllcd'} 5.Since ex-parte one thcn ln an appcared therc^is donthedatc 0n no behall' nccd OANon-ApPlicants^{have declart} ofdismissalalso^r ol'Non-Applican tosutnmons^No Appticants/Delcndants^{tohcat'thisMA} 6.Therefore^{applicationf,orrvavierisallou'e} I c S r d o tS

DATE

DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER

REMARK

MA04/23
28107123

ShriVedant^{Agrarval,Advlbrthe Applicant}
Bank
Noneforthe^{Non-APPlicant}
l.Application^{lilruavicr ttlissucnoticctothc}
Non-Rpplicarrts^{istakcnuplbrconsideration'}
2. Applicant^{Counsclb1inritingattcntion-trr}
ordeidated^{O4llll22passedundcrOA}
No.306i16^{submitsthatonthedateo}
dismissalof^{OAnooneappearedonbehalfo}
Non-Appticants^{therelbrethcreisnoneedtt}
issueir.rrlont^{lil'Non-Applicantslir}
hearing on^{this MA.}
appearedon^{bchall'ol'theA}
onbehall-of^{Non-APPlicant}
3.Applicant^{CounseltufthersLrbmitsthatii}
OAalsoNon-^{Aplllicarltsltavcalrcad]}
declaredex-paltc^{andrrithdlawalaflldaviti}
OAhasalreadY^beenf-rled.
4.Looking^{tothe lactthaton0alll/22r'r'hcl}
OAno.306/16^{u'ascallcdlorhcaringnoot"l}
pplicantsandal:l
stoothenOAhd
beendismissed^{lorwantofprosecution andfl}
restoration^{o1-thesamcthisMAisfllcd'}
5.Since
ex-parte
one
thcn
ln
an
appcared
therc^is
donthedatc
0n
no
behall'
nccd
OANon-ApPlicants^{have declart}
ofdismissalalso^r
ol'Non-Applican
tosutnmons^No
Appticants/Delcndants^{tohcat'thisMA}
6.Therefore^{applicationf,orrvavierisallou'e}
I
c
S
r
d
o
tS

DATE

DESCRIPT]ONOFTHE ORDER

REMARK

7.Applicantsare giverrliberq,nottois
noticetotheNon-Applicants.
8.ApplicantCounseI hear.dllnallronMA.
9. ApplicantCounselby,.invitingattention
sealcndorsedb1thcr.cgistrl,infirs1page
ordcrsubnritsthaton r.cccilingcopy,oIor
on28llll22thisMnhas becnIlcld
20112122whichiswithin30claysfi
receivingthecopyoforder.
Lre
n
ol'
cf
m
t1

10.ApplicanlCounscllurlhcr subrlitst
belorercceivingcopyolorder,Applica
havingnoknowlcdgethatOAhasbe
dismissedforwantofpr.osecution.
t
tS
n

Il.Sincc
contention
nothingonlecoldtorcbut
ol-ApplicantCounseland
tI
n
it
n
c
o
S
perusalol'freecop),senttothe Applicants
revealslhat lieecop\hasbeensent
28ll

122u'hichshousthatalicrr.ccciringt
copy ApplicantI-]ankrvould havecame
knowabout disnrissalol'OAthereforcMA
filed withintinrc.

t
t2.
time
Sincc applicalionhas beenfilcdwith
andApplicantBankdesirestorvithdra
n
theOAsincewithdrawalaffidavithas alrea
beenlrledtheninthcintcrcstofiustice
wouldbe.iustanclltntpertol.cstorethenratt
sothatwithdrarvalallldavitrnayconsidcrcdo
merit.
r

DATE

OESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER

REMARK

14.Dismissal^{orcler passedon04/lll22under}
theOANo.306/16^{ishereby' setaside andOA}
No.306/16^{ishereb.'-t'cstoredforheariltgon}
mcritinoriginal^rlutnbct"

15.Registry^{isdircctcdtorcstorethcmattcr}
andlist^{betbrethcl]cnchlorhearingon merit'}
16.With this^{ot"rsclvatiorlthisMAisclisposcd}
of finally.

17.I{ecord^{beconsignccltotherecord room.}
,t.;ft'Sl
(naffiIwas
b
?atel)
Prcsiding Officer
l).ll.T,.labalPttr
(Nt.P&c.G)

Icici Bank Limited v. M/S Garlico Industries Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Icici Bank Limited v. M/S Garlico Industries Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Union Bank of India versus Indira Industries Limited

Shobha Rani versus Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Ltd.

Shrinivas Tiwari versus Uco Bank

State Bank of India versus M/S Mishra Agencies

Indian Bank versus M/S Naivedhya Fly Ash Bricks

Indian Bank versus Vaishali Trivedi