State Bank of India v. a Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed an application to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to inspect and verify original documents held by the CBI against the applicant bank's copies filed in a money claim regarding loan recovery.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner for verification of documents and fixing remuneration at Rs.10,000/-.
What the court decided
MA No.135/2023 in OA Dy.No.2404/2023
23.11.2023
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL – III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K. Presiding Officer
MA No. 135/2023 in OA Dy.No.2404/2023
State Bank of India,
Retail Assets Centralized Processing Centre, Rep. by its Chief Manager No. 388, Velacherry Main Road, Satheesh Paradise, First Floor, Selaiyur, Chennai – 600 073
.....Petitioner/Applicant
Vs.
1. Mr. A. Kumar,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to appoint an Advocate Commissioner as prayed by the applicant bank for document verification.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Mr. A. Kumar
- respondent
Inspector of Police, CBI, ACB, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court