In an application for condonation of delay, this tribunal allowed the applicant bank to re-present an application for restoring an order previously dismissed for default, permitting an 82-day delay due to a misunderstanding about loan settlement.
Condoned delay of 82 days; MA allowed and restored; registry directed to number MA SR No.10791/2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MA No.113/2023 in OA No.485/2019
01.09.2023
1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL – III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 01st day of September, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K.
Presiding Officer
MA No. 113/23 in OA No.485/2019
UCO Bank, Pondicherry Main Branch, Represented by its Assistant General Manager, No.37, Rue Mahe De Labourdonnais, Pondicherry – 605 001. .....Applicant
Vs.
Rep. by its Proprietarix
Mrs. Kalpana Patel,
W/o. Mr. Dinesh Patel, R.S. No. 52/4P, O.K.Palayam Revenue Village, 100 Feet Road, Marapalayam, Pondicherry – 605 004.
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. M. Muthukumaran
MA No.113/2023 in OA No.485/2019 2
01.09.2023
O R D E R
4. Call on 08.11.2023 for marking of documents.
(Dictated to Steno (GS), transcribed by her, corrected, signed and processed through E-drt on this the 01st day of September, 2023)
Sd/-
(GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in re-presenting an application for restoration of an order dismissed for default can be condoned?
UCO Bank
M/s. Selva Furniture
Mrs. Kalpana Patel
Mrs. D. Kalpana Patel
Mrs. Laxmi N. Patel
M/s. Vishwam Industries
Ganapathi K.R.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
