Court allowed Chamber Appeal due to absence of counsel in written affidavit. Matter listed for further hearing.
Chamber Appeal allowed and matter listed for further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 01.07. Sr. No |
2023 .47 CA No. 6/2023 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| CHAMBER APPEAL NO. 6 of 2023 | ||
| Union Bank Of India ..Applicant Versus Annasaheb Kashinath Kale ..Defendants Mr. Kulkarni Vivek B - Advocate for the applicant. The matter is taken through Video Conference. 1. In this matter the learned counsel for the applicant bank submits that on 24thApril, 2023 he was out of station and he has requested his associate to attend the matter. In the matter she appeared and sought date. However, later on they notices that her attendance was not recorded and the matter was dismissed. The affidavit of the concerned advocate is filed. 2. I have no reason to disbelieve the same. The chamber Appeal shall be allowed. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. Chamber Appeal No.6/2023 allowed. B. List this matter through VC/hybrid before the Registrar for removal of the objections on21stJuly, 2023. The parties may download the order from the official web-sit. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (CA No.6 of 2023) Page 1 of 1
Union Bank Of India
Annasaheb Kashinath Kale
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
