State Bank of India v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
SA **66 of 2022** between State Bank of India and Uco Bank disposed as withdrawn at the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna, citing no dispute regarding plot identity.
What did the court decide?
Special Appeal **66 of 2022** disposed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA -----------~----------~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----------,~~-------Date of der Order with the or proceeding Signature of the Court
Office action taken i~i'thdata
8.7.2022
| SA 66 of2022 State Bank of India versus Uco Bank |
|
|---|---|
| Present | : Shri Abhay Kr. Sinha Ld. Counsel for the applicant Shri R.K. Pandey ld. counsel for the respondent |
| Ld. Counsel for the respondent files reply/counter affidavit. Ld. Counsel |
|
| for the of the buyer. which therefor any. Patna |
applicant has submits that both the banks have conducted the auction sale plots in question recently and both the plots have been purchased by same Hence now there is no dispute remains regarding the identity' of the plots was secured by way of mortgage. Since, no cause of action remains, e, applicant wants to withdraw the SA. Accordingly this SA is disposed off as withdrawn with all pending lAs if Consign the record A copy of the order be sent to the parties. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. (Kaushalendra Yadav Presiding Officer |
j)
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Uco Bank
Coram
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court