A Recovery Tribunal dismissed an applicant's special application and a prayer for condonation of delay, holding that the applicant failed to prove knowledge of proceedings and provide a satisfactory explanation for the lapse of time beyond the limitation period.
Application for condonation of delay dismissed; Special application dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DE,BTS RECOVERY TRIBLINAL LUCKNOW
Present: A. H. Khan, Presiding Officer
Date of order 19-09-2022
S.A. No.565 of 2022
Present:-
Counsel for the applicant Mr.Suneet K.Sharma Counsel for the bank Mr. Sanieev Sineh
l. Arguments on the issue of limitation were heard on 30-08-22 and case was reseryed for pronouncement of orders.
i
,V
File be consigned to record room.
,/ .\ 1A. {Khant Presiding Officer
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant has made out a sufficient case for condonation of delay in filing the special application under Section 66B of the SARFAESI Act.
Whether the special application is barred by limitation and hence liable to be dismissed.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
A. H. Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
