Abhay Kumar v. Bank of India
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Vfl.g. iqt -ca/zozz
1 uTr r{fr3fifuiD,{ur il{mw
(ltaqt?T gs ud-s.rd rrw)
(ffi'{ oTffi -qTnfiq fr rrq ftqrsq}d)
Tfl.g. iqt -$/zozz
- sFTq erIR,311-F1q wrflq fr {rqr1Eurgdfl,g:s -qq.qrfu-{ r-sg, {ieft Trr-r o-rdfi qsrq -qrfuqt (vq. fr.),+zaoor,
2.qst gqnqH fronrq gqR, sq o-ftq,vrfu-{ r-ss,.r-ipfr nq-q.fl-dtfi qsrq rqrfuw (9r.ft.),+z+oot....
eTliffilrur t
EFq
- il-f, Glq' sEsqr,.-qrfu{i d_{ d"€qq ordw \iq-q.l\rl oroq, -qrfuqr, 4t4oos,gM qfi-q-d olffi... .... . . ....gfrnqrfr I
3r-a-ffi +t sllr t fr sqTrfqa etkqffirt
sorqrfr t-fi o1 fr{ t * o.ft-dgrd srBq-mr I
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order under Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 is liable to be quashed.
Whether the respondent authority has failed to dispose of the applications regarding land claims of the petitioners.
Whether the notice issued under the Act was defective and required correction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Director General of Systematic Investment Plan
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
M. R. K. Pratap
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court