The application was disposed of as infructuous because the respondent bank had withdrawn its entire process and demand notice, leaving nothing remaining for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
Present: A. H. Khan,Presiding Officer
Date of order 26.7.2022
In
S.A. No. 35 of2022
S1. No. 84
Present:-
Mr. Sanieev Sharma Ld. Counsel forthe aPPligq4! Mr. Suneet Kr. Sharma Ld. Counsel for theresP. bank
Counsel forthe respondent FI statedthat the bank had withdrawn its entire processincluding the demand notice'
Heard the counselfor the parties. Since the bank had withdrawnits entire process,therefore,nothing remained for adjudication. The presenr-$'A' is disposed ofbeing infructuous. t
t
Let the file beconsignedto record.
(A.H.Khan)
aPPligq4!
resP. bank
A. H. Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
