3' The case of the applicants, in brief is that they have availed cerrain credit facirities from Res.No. r bank and have moftgaged the subject propcr.r_\ to secure the same' That without classifying the account as NpA. b.nk rrad issued dernand notice dtd.l 9-06-17 which has not been served on the applicants. That bank had also issued possession notice dtd.24_r l_2, wrricrr has also not been served on applicants nor affixed on secured asset arcl published in r-rewspapers' That applicants have submitted their or.s p.opr)s.r with the bank and that bank has also not provided copy of notices isrsue<r 'r rhem under SARFAESI Act. That ba,k has violated terms of oTS ,gr..,,.,.,,, and on ternporary deficiency of depositing the amount with a deray .f arr.Lrr one month, had proceeded further with the recov( had published the sale notice on 30-0 4-22 but#:::'r#ir.]5:,:':]l when applica.ts applicants deposited nor affixed the sare some amount notice on secured into asset. That oTS account on rhe,y lg_05_r2 \ver.e info,ned that the subject property has been sord. That on 0g_06_22 rvhen applicants approached the uunt to know the status of sare, they were pror,rdr.cr with copy of Sale Intimation letters. Th;; ol'nu. not provided cretairs ,r. payment made by auction purchaser and copy of Sale certificate issued tcr Res'No'2 and 3' That applicant have ....id the possession ,otice dtcr. 28-08-19 and rrave never received possession notice dtd,24_rr_2L .fhat t,, / 27-12-21 applicants have subrnitted oTS offer letter which was rer i:.ecr
