The Debt Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow disposed of Special Appeal No. 275 of 2022 as withdrawn. The Tribunal found the appeal infructuous because the applicant's counsel stated that the account between the parties had been settled.
The special appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNALLUCKNOW
Present: A. H. Khan,Presiding Officer
Date of order 16.8.2022
In
S.A. No. 275 of2022
S1. No. 62
Present:-
BH of Mr. G.S. Chauhan Ld. Counsel forthe aPPlicant Ld. Counsel for theresP. bank None
Counsel for theapplicantstated that account has been settled and the S.A. has becomeinfructuous.
In view of the statementmade by the counsel for the applicant, the S. has become infructuousand is accordinglydisposedof as withdrawn. / /
Let the file be consignedto record.
(AA.I(han) Presiding Officer
The Applicant
The Respondent Bank
A. H. Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
