Disposed
N P Jose v. Uco Bank
DRTSA/162/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
An S.A. filed against a bank was disposed of as withdrawn. The account was upgraded and the applicant wished not to prosecute the case.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶2
PAGE No
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA162t22 12t12t22 |
AppticantbyShriAnuj Agrawal,Advocate Respondent-Bank by ShriSachinJain,Advocate TheCounselforAppticanthasfitedalylemoforfiting WithdrawalaffidavitalongwithaffidavitofShriN.P. Jose,Applicant,dated12112122whichistakenon record.ltisstatedonoaththatduringthependency ofthemattertheAppticantshavedeposited appropriate amounttorestructureaccountsand the accounts has beenupgradedon21111122andboth theaccountsare regularasondate.The counselfor theAppticantfurtherpraysforwithdrawatofthe instantSAsincetheAppticant doesnot wantto prosecutethe instantcase. TheCounselforRespondent Bank consentedtothe facts laiddownbytheCounse[forApplicant. Keepinginviewthe fact that the twoloanaccounts oftheAppticantwereupgraded on21111122 andthe Appticantdoesnotwishtoprosecutethecase further,thepresent5Astandsdisposedofas withdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto herecordroom. (Ram s Patet) Presidingofficer a) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Shri Anuj Agarwal and Shri N.P. Jose
- respondent
Bank
Coram
AI extract
Ram s Patet
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court