Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna disposed of the Special Application (SA) 137 of 2022 by dismissing it as infructuous because the respondent Bank withdrew the SARFAESI action and possession notice.
Special Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Office action taken with data
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
|---|---|
| SA 137of2022 | |
| 06.12.2022 | Ld. Counsel for the Respondent Bank submitted that the Bank does not want to continue with the SARFAESI action underae and the possession notice is already withdrawn. Accordingly, the S~ecome. infructuous. Hence, this SA is dismissed as infructuous. Consigned to record. |
| Patna V. (Kaushalendra Yadav_J_ Presiding Officer |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Special Application should be dismissed as infructuous given the withdrawal of possession action.
Petitioner
Respondent Bank
Kaushalendra Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
