The applicant failed to appear in response to the summons. The Single Judge dismissed the application in default of appearance and ordered the closure of the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 20/09/2022 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in SA 116 of 2022 Pradnya Prakash Humane and Others Vs Bank of India |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ex-11 | None for the applicant. Advocate Pallavi Chari i/b Advocate O.A. Das appeared for the respondent no. 3 and 4. Advocate Prafull Chipte i/b Sanjay A. appeared for the respondent. None appeared for the applicant therefore, SA is hereby dismissed in default. File be close and consigned to record room. Affidavit in reply. Sd/- P.O. DRT-I |
Sgj/-38
Pradnya Prakash Humane and Others
Bank of India
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
