The application was dismissed in default due to the absence of the applicant despite repeated calls. No substantive decision on the merits was rendered.
Application dismissed in default of appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA 111/2022 RAMAN TRADERS VS. PNB
09.12.2022 Item No.102
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh. Ankit Kaushal, Counsel for the respondent bank.
It is 3:00 pm, case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, the application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
DILPREET$
Raman Traders
PNB
A. S. Narang
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
