The applicant failed to appear despite multiple adjournments. The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the application as a default order while the respondent appeared by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/110/2022 NAVNEET KAUR Vs UNION BANK OF INDIA
17.10.2022 Item No.51
Present: None for the Applicant. Sh. C K Jha, Counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
It is 3:00pm, case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, the application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
DILPREET$
Navneet Kaur
Union Bank of India
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
