Interpretation of the Debt Recovery Tribunal allowed the withdrawal of an original application due to a full settlement and payment by the defendants, resulting in the dismissal of the original application with no order as to costs.
Permission to withdraw the Original Application granted; OA dismissed as withdrawn; court fees refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.8
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1964 of 2022
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.451 of 2022
ICICI Bank Limited … Applicant
Versus
Mr Sameer Rafik Motorwala & Ors. … Defendants
Ms Ruchi Bagwe i/b M/s Vidhi Partners – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 26th September 2022.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai
Nidhi
Page 1 of 2
Sr. No.8
26.09.2022
| OA No.451 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Limited Vs. Mr Sameer Rafik Motorwala & Ors. |
| Ms Ruchi Bagwe i/b M/s Vidhi Partners – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.1964 of 2022 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.1964 of 2022, O.A. No.451 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per Rules. |
||
| Nidhi | Sd/- Presiding Officer, D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai |
Page 2 of 2
ICICI Bank Limited
Mr Sameer Rafik Motorwala & Ors.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
