Disposed
Bank of India v. M/s. Ace Engineering
DRTOA/357/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
¶2
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
¶3
ORDER SHEET
¶4
22.08.2022
¶5
Sr. No.17
¶6
| OA No.357 of 2002 | ||
|---|---|---|
| lassify -cation |
No. of Exh. |
HDFC Bank Ltd. Vs. Vinod Gupta & Ors. |
| Mr Nikhil Gupta i/b M/s Wadia Ghandy & Co. – Advocates for the applicant. |
||
| Mr Ranit Basu and Ms Matri Malde – Advocate for defendants. |
||
| 1. Defendant no.1 is directed to file CAOD as and by way of last chance. 2. For arguments, stand-over to 19thSeptember, 2022. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai |
¶7
Radhika
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
HDFC Bank Ltd.
Coram
AI extract
Presiding Officer
D.R.T.No.2, Mumbai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · P.o
- Order 2 · Deepak M. Thakkar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court