The applicant filed an order application (OA) for recovery of dues. During the pendency, the borrower deposited the overdue amount, upgrading the loan account. The applicant withdrew the case citing this fact. The present OA is disposed of as withdrawn by the President Officer.
The present OA stands disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA320t27 16/09t22 |
Applicantby Shri Jagbandhan Patet, Advocate NonefortheDefendants |
|
| TheCounselforAppticanthasfitedanapplicationfor withdrawaloftheoriginalappticationlA1375122 dated22107/22.ltisstatedthattheApplicant-Bank hasfitedthepresentOAforrecoveryofRs. 45,82,026.26togetherwithinterestandotherreliefs againsttheDefendantsbutduringthependencyof themattertheborrower haddepositedtheoverdue amountandis outofNPAcategory sincehisloan accountisupgraded.ThecounselfortheApplicant- Bankfurtherpraysfor withdrawal of thecase. |
||
| Keepinginviewthefact that theborrowerby depositingtheoverdue amounthad upgradedhis[oan accountandtheAppticant-Bankdoesnotwishto prosecutethecasefurther,thepresentOAstands disposedofaswithdrawn. atet) Presi gofficer |
Applicant-Bank
Defendants
President Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
