O/A filed by State Bank of India against Kuldip Singh in DRT-I, Chandigarh was dismissed as withdrawn because parties had compromised the matter and the applicant did not wish to pursue it.
OA dismissed as withdrawn; court fees refunded to applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/30/2022 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs KULDIP SINGH
07.12.2022 Item No.28
Present: Ms.Nitika Sharma Chugh, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Amit Kumar Shukla, and has made a statement at the bar that the parties have compromised the matter for sum of Rs.30,70,902/- and she does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn . Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
STATE BANK OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
