Punjab National Bank v. M/s Vasisth Layer Firm and Others
DRTOA/256/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Issue for consideration
Whether proceeding ex-parte against defendants in the absence of their appearance is justified.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Office action taken with clata . .
¶2
| DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL PATNA OA 256 of 2022 Punjab National Bank vs M/s Vasisth Layer Firm and others Present: Shri Rajan Ghoshrave Ld. counsel for the applicant None for the defendants. |
|
|---|---|
| ,,~,',' 3.10.2022 1'- |
Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that notices/summons have already been served by registered post and also by way of publication in newspaper. But the defendants have not appeared so far. As there is a report of Registrar regarding service of notices/summons, proceed ex-parte against defendants. Put up on 28.12.2022 for ex-parte hearing. |
| Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website Patna V (Kaushalendra Yada Presiding Officer |
¶3
,,/' :
¶4
~.'.!,
¶5
; ,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether proceeding ex-parte against defendants in the absence of their appearance is justified.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
M/s Vasisth Layer Firm and others
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yada
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · P.o
- Order 2 · P.o
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court