Bank of India v. Babulal
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.905
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.1932 of 2022 In SECURITISATION APPLICATION NO.248 of 2022
Best & Crompton Engineering … Applicants Projects Ltd. & Ors. Versus
Central Bank of India & Ors. … Defendants
Mr Chandra Naik i/b M/s. Chandra Naik & Asso. – Advocates for the applicants.
Ms Priyanka Susdure i/b Mr R.J. Singh – Advocate for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 23rd August, 2022.
ORDER
- Ms Susdure, representing the secured creditor, submits that the authorized officer did not receive any bid and therefore, the auction failed for want of bid.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Best & Crompton Engineering projects Ltd. & Ors.
Coram
Deepak M. Thakkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · P.o
- Order 2 — this page · P.o
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court