Uco Bank v. Savita Prashar
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-tr, CHANDIGARH
o[l L669 / 2022 UCO BANK VS SAVITA PRASHAR
AWARD
t2.L1.2022 Item No.47
Present: sn..Qrt"noIh &h,.noo{,,oJcounsel for the Applicant. - sh. ,Counsel for defendants.
File put up in the "Lok Adalat".
Bank has filed the affidavit to the effect that the account has been regularized and it does not want to pursue the present oA Accordingly, the oA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn.
A copy of this order be given to both the parties free of cost. File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
fA (r\egt5Lr or /
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCO BANK
- other
SAVITA PRASHAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court