The Tribunal dismissed the Motion Admitted (MA) filed to set aside an ex-parte order. The court held that the petitioners failed to establish bona fides or provide cogent reasons for non-contestation and debt discharge.
The motion amended and the related motion to set aside ex-parte order are dismissed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
08.07.2022
MA 37/22 in OA No.316/2017
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL – III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 08th day of July, 2022
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K. Presiding Officer
M.A. No. 37/22 in OA No.316/2017
UCO BANK, Purasaiwalkam Branch, Represented by its Chief Manager Chennai. ….Respondent Bank
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for petitioners : Sh. K.A. Ramakrishnan
O R D E R
2
08.07.2022
MA 37/22 in OA No.316/2017
3
08.07.2022
MA 37/22 in OA No.316/2017
guidelines.
(Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, corrected, signed and processed through E-drt on this the 08th day of July, 2022)
Sd/- (GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to set aside the ex-parte order dated 25.11.2019 passed against the defendants.
M/s. ADHI RRICHES AND ACCREDITS
UCO BANK
Ganapathi K.R.K
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
