The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an application by the applicant bank seeking permission to withdraw an OA, having received the compromise amount, and dismissed the RC as withdrawn.
MA allowed; RC no. 39 of 2010 dismissed as withdrawn; original documents to be returned to applicant bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA | ||
|---|---|---|
| Date of order or proceeding |
Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with data |
| MA 180 of 2022 | ||
| 16.12.2022 | This Miscellaneous Application has been filed by applicant seeking permission to withdraw the RC no. 39 of2010 in OA no.31 of2007. It is stated therein that the matter has been compromised and the compromise amount has been received by the applicant bank. This application is supported by an affidavit of Shri Debanjan Roy, Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank, SME Branch, JJ Complex East Boring Canal Road, Patna which substantiates the contents of the application. It is also supported by a copy of letter dated 19.9.2022 address to Shri Ramjivan Prasad ld. counsel for the applicant bank with instructions to withdraw the OA in question. Under the circumstances, the MA stands allowed and RC no.39 of2010 is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Original documents, if any lying with the Tribunal be returned to the applicant bank as per rule. Consigned the record. A Copy of order be sent to the parties and Ld. Recovery Officer for necessary action. Order to be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. (KaUSha,u.:: Presiding Officer Patna |
Punjab National Bank
KaUSha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
