The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the interim application. The applicants did not wish to prosecute the matter further despite a pending review application. The matter was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a review petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the interim application with liberty to file a review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No.
CASE NO
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| M15/22 13 t07/72 |
ShriRajeshMaindiretta,Advfor theAppticants ShriShashankDubey, Advfor theRespondentNo.1 NoneforRespondent No.2 and3 OnrequestbyAppticantCounselmatteristakenup. AppticantCounsetinvitedattentionofthisBenchonlA No.1137/22dated22106/22 submitsthatthe applicants doesnotwanttoprosecutethis[tAfurther andhasseekspermissiontowithdrawwithlibertyto fileareview apptication. AppticantCounsel atsoapprisedtheBenchthatreview appticationhasatreadybeenfitedwhichisnumbered asRANo.03/22 whichislistedforhearingtodayitsetf. |
|
| Sincetheappticantshimsetfdoesnotwantto prosecute this/v1Afurthertherefore interimapptication lANo.1137/72dated22/06122 appticationfor withdrawalofthisAtAisherebyaltowedandthe applicantsarepermittedtowithdrawwithlibertyto filereviewpetitionwhichhasalreadybeenfiled. Matteris disposedofaswithdrawn. Record be consignedto therecordroom.u (RamNi atet) Presidingofficer |
Applicants
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Ram Ni Natet
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
