A single-member bench restored an original application (OA No.1587/2019) in a debts recovery tribunal case previously dismissed as withdrawn due to an administrative inadvertence.
The OA No.1587/2019 is restored to its original status and summons are to be issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
MA/13/2022 In OA 1587/2019 STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs RANJIT SINGH
18.08.2022
Item No.48
Present: Sh. Aseem Kataria, Counsel for the Applicant Bank.
Heard on MA No.13/2022
This is an application for restoration of OA No.1587/2019 which was dismissed as withdrawn on 14.05.2022. In the application, it has been mentioned that some other case wherein, the particulars were the same, was to be withdrawn. Inadvertently, the present case was dismissed as withdrawn. Subject to all just grounds, the application is hereby allowed. Let the OA No.1587/2019 be restored to its original. Summons be issued in the Original Application.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MG
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an original application dismissed as withdrawn should be restored due to an inadvertent error?
Whether summons should be issued in the restored original application?
STATE BANK OF INDIA
RANJIT SINGH
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
