This chamber appeal was dismissed for non-registration by the DRAT Registrar. The appellant failed to remove defects despite opportunity, presuming lack of interest. The appeal was declined under DRAT Rules.
Cl萍 appeal D. No. 330/2026 declined for registration under Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Chamber Appeal D. No. 330/2026
Sunil Ramdasji Chandekar
Appellant
-Vs-
Shikshak Sahakari Bank Limited
Respondents
Chamber Appeal D. No. 330/2026 is listed on today's board (27.07.2026) before the Ld. Registrar at 11.30 AM for compliance/removal of defects. The said Board is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on the Notice Board of DRAT Mumbai.
Adv. Bharti Suvarna appeared for the Appellant when matter is called out.
This Chamber Appeal D. No. 330/2026 was filed on 26.02.2026 and certain objections were raised by the Registry for compliance/removal of defects. However, despite sufficient opportunity, appellant failed to comply with/remove the defects till date.
Therefore, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in pursuing with the matter.
In view of the above & under the provisions of Sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 of DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 the Chamber Appeal D. No. 330/2026 is hereby declined for Registration.
Date: 27.07.2026
Registrar DRAT Mumbai
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant registration to an appeal that failed to comply with defects despite sufficient opportunity.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Ramdasji Chandekar
Shikshak Sahakari Bank Limited
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
