Sri Narayana v. Svc Co. Operative Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
This DRAT order dismisses an application seeking to condone a 509-day delay in filing an appeal. The court held there were no sufficient reasons because the appeal was initially filed late, followed by a delayed writ petition, jeopardizing the respondent's recovery actions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
Dated the 28th day of July, 2026
PRESENT: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CHAIRPERSON
IA 531 of 2025 (Delay) in AIR 193 of 2025
(arising out of MA 7 of 2021 in OA 816 of 2017 on the file of DRT-II, Karnataka at Bengaluru)
Between
Sri. Narayana (Deceased), S/o late Muthaiah, Rep by his LRs 1. Mrs. Mayamma, W/o late Narayana
- Mr. Suriyanarayana, S/o late Narayana
- Mr. Bhagavan, S/o late Narayana
All are residing at
No. 119, 3rd Cross, 5th Main Road, Channamanakere Achukattu, BSK 3rd Stage, Bengaluru – 560 085
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is made out to condone a delay of 509 days in filing an appeal.
Whether the successive delays in recalling an ex-parte order and filing a writ petition justify condonation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Mayamma
- appellant
Mr. Suriyanarayana
- appellant
Mr. Bhagavan
- respondent
SVC Co-operative Bank Ltd
- respondent
Mrs. Vijaya
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090001932025
- Bench
- G. Chandrasekharan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court